Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[DOWNLOAD] "Drinski v. Putek Et Al." by In Banc No. 17803 Appellate Court of Indiana ~ eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

Drinski v. Putek Et Al.

๐Ÿ“˜ Read Now     ๐Ÿ“ฅ Download


eBook details

  • Title: Drinski v. Putek Et Al.
  • Author : In Banc No. 17803 Appellate Court of Indiana
  • Release Date : January 19, 1949
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 52 KB

Description

BOWEN, Judge. In the court below a complaint was filed by one Mary Drieciniak against her daughter, Joan Drinski, appellee herein, who was married during this litigation and her true name became Joan Drinski Putek, and where the names Joan Drinski or Joan Drinski Putek appear in this opinion they refer to the same person. This suit sought to set aside a contract between plaintiff and the defendant, Joan Drinski Putek, and to set aside a deed made by the plaintiff, conveying certain real estate in Lake County, Indiana, to Joan Drinski. A cross-complaint was filed by Marjorie Drinski, the appellant herein, who was made a new party cross-defendant in a cross-complaint filed by Joan Drinski to quiet title to the real estate described in the complaint. Marjorie Drinski filed answer to the cross-complaint of Joan Drinski, and also filed a cross-complaint in two paragraphs. The first paragraph of appellant's cross-complaint alleged in substance that the appellant's and appellees' mother, Mary Drieciniak, now deceased, was during her lifetime the owner in fee simple of certain real estate in Gary, Indiana. That during her lifetime, the said Mary Drieciniak entered into a contract in writing with the appellee, Joan Drinski, and that at the time of the execution of such contract said Mary Drieciniak did purport to convey such real estate to the said Joan Drinski. That the consideration for such transfer and conveyance failed in that in violation of said contract and the terms thereof the said Joan Drinski did fail to care for, maintain, and support the said Mary Drieciniak as long as said Mary Drieciniak should live and did fail to pay the expenses of the said Mary Drieciniak in illness, in health, and the burial expenses, and that the said Joan Drinski has and did fail to pay unto appellant the sum of $1.00 as provided for in such contract.


PDF Books Download "Drinski v. Putek Et Al." Online ePub Kindle